Marseille and Athletic Bilbao: Clubs with Zero Signings
When the transfer window finally slammed shut, the usual numbers game began. Billions spent, hundreds of deals done, squads reshaped overnight. Amid the frenzy, two names stood out for doing absolutely nothing.
Olympique de Marseille. Athletic Bilbao.
Across Europe’s top five leagues, they are the only clubs who did not register a single incoming player. No permanent signings, no loan gambles, no options triggered at the last minute. Nothing.
On paper, they share the same statistic. In reality, they could not be further apart.
Athletic’s Silence: A Tradition, Not a Crisis
For Athletic Bilbao, this is not a shock. It is a statement of identity.
The Basque club has long lived by one of the most distinctive recruitment policies in world football: build from within, lean on the academy, and sign only players from the Basque region or of Basque heritage. Their market is small by design. Their solution is continuity.
So a quiet summer in Bilbao feels almost natural. It fits the club’s philosophy, its rhythm. When other sides scramble on deadline day, Athletic look inward – to Lezama, to the next generation, to the familiar core already in the dressing room.
Their inactivity is not a failure of planning. It is the plan.
Marseille’s Silence: A Void Created by Constraint
In Marseille, the same outcome tells a very different story.
Here, the lack of signings is not born of tradition but of constraint. Severe financial limits choked off any meaningful business during the window, leaving one of France’s biggest clubs watching from the sidelines as rivals strengthened around them.
And while no one came in, plenty went out.
- Mason Greenwood left for Fenerbahce.
- Facundo Medina headed to Leverkusen.
- Quinten Timber joined Crystal Palace.
- Geronimo Rulli moved to Manchester City.
- Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang departed for La Coruna.
- Leonardo Balerdi signed for Roma.
- Bilal Nadir and Hamed Traore also exited.
That is not just trimming at the edges. That is a core being stripped away.
The result is stark: a drastically depleted squad, no reinforcements, and a season that suddenly looks a lot longer than the fixture list suggests.
Two Clubs, One Statistic, Opposite Futures
The same number – zero signings – carries completely different weight.
For Athletic, it reinforces a long-held belief that identity can trump the market. For Marseille, it exposes the fragility of a project constrained by finances and forced to improvise.
At the Vélodrome, the pressure now shifts inside the club. Coaches and recruitment staff must squeeze every drop from what they already have. Youth development is no longer a luxury or a slogan; it is a necessity. Internal solutions are not a talking point; they are the only path.
Domestically and in Europe, Marseille will have to fight with what remains, not what might have been.
As the season accelerates and injuries, suspensions, and fatigue inevitably bite, one question will hang over the club: can a squad that has only lost and never added really withstand the demands of modern competition?






